I don’t live in Tulsa anymore. I wish I did, but I don’t.
I was thinking today, that Tulsa has the best of everythying. The best neighborhoods, the best running trails, the best stores, restaraunts, everything – except for schools, which is why I don’t live in Tulsa anymore. Instead, I live here in the tolerable but lacking Chambana, and being who I am, I wander as I have for the past two years in search of great coffee. Here Tulsa has Illinois beat.
This is because Tulsa is home to DoubleShot . The best coffee in the Southwest, and as I’ve come to see, the Northeast and Midwest as well. I started going to DoubleShot regularly in March 2004, at the end of my senior year, and it became (as any place will if you visit many times a day) a second home. To this day, when I walk into DS and see that something has changed (as it ususally does) I react the same as when my parent change something in the house. I feel little betrayed, and then remember that I don’t live here anymore. So I settle in, and hopefully Brian will be in to make the espresso.
Brian is the owner at DS, and some refer to him as the coffee nazi, which may or may not be a title that he cherishes, but I’d rather think of him as the Godfather of coffee (“Don’t ever ask me about my business.”). You see, the coffee at DoubleShot is perfect, in a way that would blow your mind. I always thought espresso was supposed to be bitter until I tasted Brian’s. It comes to you first in it’s fragrance, a thick layer of foam on top, and when you gulp it down, its flavor is sweet and doesn’t overcome you. Perfection, sheer perfection. And this is because Brian is a perfectionist. I respect perfection, and those who aspire to it, and I never believe those who claim it doesn’t exist.
It’s a place for people who love coffee. Don’t ever order something silly at DS. Just don’t.
If you do, you’ll find out the hard way that DoubleShot is not Starbucks, which apparently is something the execs over at Starbucks don’t realize themselves. Starbucks is attempting to sue Brian, because they claim that the name of his establishment “DoubleShot” is trademarked by them for use on their canned cream and espresso drink. They think he ought to change the name of his shop and destroy anything with the name on it.
Hmm.
For starters the purpose of a trademark is to keep consumers from being confused. For example: Coke trademarked to word “Cola” i.e., “CocaCola”. Notice that Pepsi also uses the word “Cola” in the name “Pepsi Cola”. In order for Coke to sue Pepsi for use of the word Cola, they have to prove that customers think they are buying Coke when they buy Pepsi. Obviously this is hard to prove, since Pepsi has it’s own distingushed logo, brand, etc. Aside from this, no one is so stupid as to buy Pepsi, and think they’re buying Coke.
In the case of Starbucks, they’re really flattering themselves if they think that we all assume we’re buying their packaged “espresso drink” when we buy Brian’s espresso. Not to mention that “douleshot” is a generic industry term like “coffee” and that the actual trademark registered by Starbucks reads “Starbucks DoubleShot”. Not “doubleshot” itself, but the combination of the two words. As it has been stated before by Brian and various other bloggers, if Starbucks has the rights to “doubleshot” then I guess they have “coffee” too. Yes, folks, that’s right. Corporations have the right to trademark our language. Get your wallets out. Pay up, or learn esperanto.
Given that legally this is a barrel of silly, it violates the very spirit of capitalism. Starbucks is not winning the coffee market because they sell a good product. In fact, their coffee is probably the worst in the universe. They’ve more or less fooled the public by selling a terrible product that is highly packaged in stores with squishy, earth-toned chairs, hip color schemes, enigmatic “inspirational” quotes from NYT authors on the cups, and copies of jazz and new-age music near the register. Like everything in America, put a lot of sugar in it and they will come. Who cares about dedication, perfection, hard work. Those are antiquated notions. A little sucrose, and the people flock. Markets are no longer won by competition. Perhaps the government dabbling in the economy has so warped business that in order to make money, companies have to play a legal game instead of compete head to head. Starbucks puts people out of business not in cups of coffee sold, but in subpeonas issued, and this to me is wrong. Gone are the days when they would just try to steal the top secret formula, instead they can just trademark every word relating to coffee or its production and call it a day.
Starbucks isn’t fooling anyone with their “fair trade” coffee. If they were really concerned with fair trade in its real sense, they would stop triffling with people who really know how to serve a good product. And maybe instead of spending so much on lawyers to twist the law, they’d pick up a few books and learn how to serve a decent cup of coffee.
Rice in ’08
November 22nd, 2005 by skeetamatthewsI picked up a bio fo Condoleezza Rice yesterday, and absolutely could not put it down. The American public has a general understanding of Dr. Rice’s intelligence. Liberals, try as they may, would like us to think of Rice as nothing more than a fascist Bush cronie, but any such assumption speaks more of the speaker’s intelligence (or lack thereof) than Rice’s.
This woman was a prodigy, speaks 5 languages, and posses such a command of international affairs, that to desribe it simply as ‘impressive’ would be lacking. She isn’t a legacy like Hilary Clinton, who rides on her husband’s political prestige, but rather has earned every position granted her through sheer ability. Condi is a born and bred southerner, who experienced the civil-rights movement first-hand. In fact, one of the four young girls killed in the famous Birmingham church bombing was one of Dr. Rice’s childhood friends. She is a supporter of the 2nd amendment because her father and neighbors would sit out in front of their homes with shot-guns to protect their families from The Klan.
Whatever one thinks of president Bush, I find it impossible that a person who respects ability and intelligence could not have the uptmost admiration for Condeleeza Rice. I find it repulsive that white-liberals have the audacity to critisize her. She represents americanism in it’s purest form. She is an African-American woman who has defied what many would believe to be her determined role in society to become Secretary of State.
Secretary of F-ing State. You’ve got to be kidding me.
Not only is she an African-American woman who has defied odds to accomplish what many “privileged” americans haven’t, but she winces to think of herself as a succesful “African-American” woman. She doesn’t think that her sucess is more valid because she’s African-American. Her sucess is what it is, ethnicity aside.
Maybe Liberals can’t stand this. She’s black, right, so she ought to be down-trodden. What’s White-Liberal america for if black people can be sucessful on their own? Who needs a bunch of patronizing racists when women like Condi Rice can be Secretary of State without their sympathies or assistance? She is what the liberals claim to be their ideal realized, and yet they hate her anyway.
Probably because she can speak proper english. Oh, and she speaks French, German, Spanish and Russian pretty well too.
I strongly encourange anyone who admires ability to research Dr. Rice’s life a little more. Even if you don’t want to read her enitre biography, just a quick glance at her resume on whitehouse.gov is enough to send you into fits of awe.
Condoleezza Rice, you are my hero.
Report This Post
Posted in Social Commentary | No Comments »